Hi all...
Form social bookmarking and directory submission, According to you which one is more important from SEO point of view. I prefer social bookmarking because bookmarking sites are frequently crawl by search engine and there is no longer awaiting mode.
What is your opinion regarding to this? Please share.....
See, if you ask me on gun-point, I'd say social bookmarking. But if I've to answer w'out any such fears, I'll say both. While social bookmarking catalyses indexing and improves your website's exposure, submitting to popular niche directories helps you with high quality backlinks and also gets you streams of referral traffic.
Both are very usefull link building techniques of seo.I used both techniques.
Social bookmarking and directory submission both are very useful link building techniques of seo for getting backlinks for site.But i prefered social bookmarking more than directory submission.
social bookmarking is more effective than directory submission
Both are effective tools but I think Directory submission takes long term results, but its result are too late. Social bookmarking is more effective then Directory submission because Its results are quicker than Directory.
The directory submission and social bookmarking have same purposes.The difference is only that the directory submission approved the back link after a long time,where as the social bookmarking approved the back link quickly.
Hello..
After Google updates directory submission is not so much beneficial.Approval of directory takes a long time so i think social book marking will be better as compared to directory.....:)
Directory submission and Social bookmarking is part of OFF Page SEO.Directory Submission take more time to approval and Social bookmarking take less time to approved compare to both Social bookmarking make good effects in SEO.